GitHub project Ingar30/reviewer
Copy the install, test the workflow, then decide if it earns a permanent slot.
Still active enough to matter. Good candidate for a fast stack test instead of a long evaluation loop.
Copy the install, test the workflow, then decide if it earns a permanent slot.
You can test this quickly and remove it cleanly if it misses.
GitHub health 71/100. no security policy. Fresh enough repo health and manageable issue load keep the risk controlled.
AI Agent
Codex
Model
Multiple
Fastest way to find out if reviewer belongs in your setup.
Copy the install command, run a real test, and back it out cleanly if it slows you down.
git clone https://github.com/Ingar30/reviewer ~/.claude/commands/reviewerRun this first. You will know quickly if the workflow earns a permanent slot.
rm -rf ~/.claude/commands/reviewerNo messy cleanup loop. If it misses, remove it and keep moving.
Install Location
~/ └─ .claude/ ├─ commands/ │ └─ reviewer/ ← installs here ├─ agents/ └─ settings.json
GitHub project Ingar30/reviewer
Source: GitHub repository
Source check: July 18, 2026
Upstream commit: June 25, 2026
Repository state: Not marked archived
Honeystax upvotes are community interest signals, not star ratings. GitHub stars and repository health are source measurements; editorial risk and trial-cost notes are Honeystax analysis.